Region: Australia      US   Europe   Asia   India
You are not logged in    Login
IDS Water
The Information Resource for the Water Industry!
Browse Water Products and Suppliers by Category
Browse Water Whitepapers By Sector
Browse Water Events By Category
Participation Options 1
Bronze Free Listing
Interested in Exhibiting?
SubmitEvents
About IDS Water
Submit News
Subscribe to Water Newsletter
News ReleaseClick Here to view News Releases
Australians Should Pay Market Rates for Water Say Experts
News Source
ABC News
March 10, 2008
Click HereView Participation Packages
Click Here
Submit News
   




   

One of the most senior bureaucrats in the Commonwealth public service has proposed a new system of water trading for Australian cities.

In a speech in Melbourne last night, Treasury Secretary Ken Henry expressed frustration at the way that water is currently managed and suggested a market-based system for trading water in urban centres whereby it would be sold in the same way as electricity and gas.

He jokes that he has been accused of knowing a lot about Treasury but not much about water.

But that is not what key players in the water sector seem to think of comments he made last night when delivering the Ian Little Memorial Lecture in Melbourne.

Dr Henry has proposed a water trading system for cities, whereby usage is controlled by price instead of rationing through water restrictions.

Peter Cullen, the National Water Commissioner and a member of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists, told AM it makes sense.

"We don't ration petrol," he said.

"As petrol gets scarcer, the price goes up and we make our individual choices.

"The opportunity to really use the water market to confront the water scarcity that we now have is very important."

In saying that Australia does not currently have a well-functioning water market, Dr Henry is criticising the previous federal government and the current state governments which are responsible for allocating urban water.

Pricing signals

Professor Cullen says that for too long governments have avoided putting water prices up out of a misguided sense of social welfare.

"The argument has been [that] these poor families who can't afford it," he said.

"I think we've made a mess when we mix up water pricing with social welfare.

"Yes, there are poor people who need help and we should help them through the social welfare system, not by trying to reduce water prices."

"There are people who feel very strongly that watering their roses is important and they would be prepared to pay whatever it takes to do that. Well, why shouldn't they have that right?

"During a drought, why shouldn't water prices go up? Those who don't really need it just wouldn't use it, perhaps, at that time, so we would get a lot of better signals if we had clearer pricing."

Professor Cullen says a system like the one Dr Henry's proposing could see water restrictions in Australian cities become more of a last resort.

"I'm not sure it would mean an end because I think there will be times when the system just can't cope and you do have to have restrictions.

"But we shouldn't be having restrictions all of the time. We should be reducing the frequency and the severity perhaps of restrictions. This would take some of the heat off restrictions."

Credit for saving

Another supporter of Dr Henry's ideas is John Marsden, a water economist who has advised prime ministers and cabinets.

"What this means for the average household is that if they saved water then they could possibly get a credit," he said.

"There is obviously transaction costs, that is, it costs a lot of money to be able to trade your savings so you mightn't do it for the average household.

"But for industry or large households or people with large gardens, they can buy and sell water so that people who really want water - and that could include our local governments - they could go out and buy water in a water market and they can buy water savings.

"You could link this with a savings system. So they're the sort of things that Ken is implying."

Dr Marsden says it is the first time ideas like this have been raised so publicly from within the Federal Government and there is a strong logic behind them.

"There is a lot of thinking to be done but there is a lot of good sense in what he is saying," he said.

"If we can do it for carbon, why can't you do it for water?"

But it is unclear so far what Water Minister Penny Wong is making of Ken Henry's comments. When approached by AM, a spokeswoman declined to comment.

Other News
Russian Steel Maker Upgrades Industrial Water Supply System
9th Water Asia International Conference and Exhibition on the Water Industry
HWM Unveils Environmental Data Loggers
Research on Water Supply and Water Treatment Market in China, 2008 Available Now
AUMA Environmental Policy Endorsed by ISO Standard
Featured Whitepaper
Challenges in Measuring Combined Sewer Overflows using Ultra...

Estimates compiled prior to AMP3 identified that there are approximately 25000 comb...

                     Read more

 

Industry IDS Inc.
DELEGATES
56782
Conference Sectors  Case Studies  List of Papers  Exhibition Sectors  Vendor Presentation  List of Exhibitors  Industry News  Sponsors  All Exhibitors  All Papers  Sitemap  Registration Links ]

 :: IDS Emergency Management :: IDS Packaging ::IDS Publishing / Media::IDS Healthcare Management::IDS Environment::IDS Plastics::IDS Power/Energy:: 

Industry IDS, Inc. – Online Tradeshow, Exhibition, & Buyers Guide Solutions